Does Student Evaluation Stimulate Improved Teaching? [electronic resource] / Karl E. Vogt and Harry Lasher.

Student appraisal of faculty instructional competencies is commonplace. Although several logics account for sponsorship of student evaluation schemes, the ultimate product of student evaluation ought to be improved instruction. The purpose of this paper is to investigate relationships between studen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Vogt, Karl E.
Corporate Author: Bowling Green State University. College of Business Administration
Other Authors: Lasher, Harry
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6506195
003 CoU
005 20081118081319.5
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 730101s1973 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed078748 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED078748 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED078748 
100 1 |a Vogt, Karl E. 
245 1 0 |a Does Student Evaluation Stimulate Improved Teaching?  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Karl E. Vogt and Harry Lasher. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1973. 
300 |a 14 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED078748. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a Student appraisal of faculty instructional competencies is commonplace. Although several logics account for sponsorship of student evaluation schemes, the ultimate product of student evaluation ought to be improved instruction. The purpose of this paper is to investigate relationships between student evaluating and better teaching. A mandatory system of student assessment of teaching skills employed at Bowling Green University is the frame of reference. If student ratings contribute to better teaching, ratings should improve over time. Regression equations and standards tests were employed to determine the existence of trend increments. Findings reveal that regression coefficients of regression equations were as low as 0. By inference, student evaluation had not contributed to better teaching. Shortcomings in the administration of the evaluation scheme and faculty attitudes and capabilities account for apparent failures of the scheme to result in improved teaching. Appendices include related research material. (Author) 
650 0 7 |a College Faculty.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a College Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Student Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Student Role.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Effectiveness.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Lasher, Harry. 
710 2 |a Bowling Green State University.  |b College of Business Administration. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED078748.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65061950  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 0a3ea53e-9881-5f2d-9d31-cdcf58650cdf  |s 41b8d3ab-2add-5d5a-99b0-5e6f5b446445 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED078748  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1