Theoretically Based Studies of Patterns of Miscues in Oral Reading Performance. Final Report [electronic resource] / Kenneth S. Goodman and Carolyn L. Burke.

Reading is a process in which written language conveys meaning between writer and reader. The reader uses graphic, syntactic, and semantic cues to get to the meaning. This study examines the reading process of 94 subjects with proficiency levels ranging from low second grade to high tenth grade usin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Goodman, Kenneth S.
Corporate Author: Wayne State University
Other Authors: Burke, Carolyn L.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6507005
003 CoU
005 20080306155036.4
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 730401s1973 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed079708 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED079708 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED079708 
100 1 |a Goodman, Kenneth S. 
245 1 0 |a Theoretically Based Studies of Patterns of Miscues in Oral Reading Performance. Final Report  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Kenneth S. Goodman and Carolyn L. Burke. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1973. 
300 |a 459 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED079708. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. Bureau of Research.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Contract Number: OEG-0-9-32075-4269.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Reading is a process in which written language conveys meaning between writer and reader. The reader uses graphic, syntactic, and semantic cues to get to the meaning. This study examines the reading process of 94 subjects with proficiency levels ranging from low second grade to high tenth grade using the Goodman Taxonomy of Reading Miscues. The analysis showed reading at all levels to be consistent with the Goodman model of reading. Low proficiency readers are using the same process as high proficiency readers but less well. They are less efficient because they use more graphic, syntactic, and semantic information than they need; they have less productive strategies for using this information; and they lose more of the potential meaning. The analysis revealed no hierarchy of skills in reading development. Beyond the very lowest levels, no notable differences in handling graphic cues exist. Differences in ability to handle complex syntax disappear among readers of moderate to high proficiency. The single consistent difference between groups at successive proficiency levels is in their ability to comprehend what they read. The best indicator of reading proficiency is the percent of miscues semantically acceptable before correction. (Author/TO) 
650 1 7 |a Cognitive Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Decoding (Reading)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Miscue Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Ability.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Comprehension.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Development.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Reading Skills.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Semantics.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Syntax.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Burke, Carolyn L. 
710 2 |a Wayne State University. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED079708.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65070057  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 5b2d87a0-b778-57ec-93ca-2c1e240ed0da  |s e42066f0-c26b-5add-a359-e930c63052d4 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED079708  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1