The Democratic Albatross [electronic resource] / Dan F. Hahn and Ruth M. Gonchar.

This paper discusses ideologues, both of the far Left and the far Right, and their influences on the American political structure and our "traditional pluralistic politics," which is defined as the concept traditionally held in this country that politics function within a clash of interest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Hahn, Dan F.
Other Authors: Gonchar, Ruth M.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1972.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6507049
003 CoU
005 20090120104502.5
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 721201s1972 xx |||| o ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed079786 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED079786 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED079786 
100 1 |a Hahn, Dan F. 
245 1 4 |a The Democratic Albatross  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Dan F. Hahn and Ruth M. Gonchar. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1972. 
300 |a 11 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED079786. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Assn. (58th, Chicago, Dec. 27-30, 1973).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a This paper discusses ideologues, both of the far Left and the far Right, and their influences on the American political structure and our "traditional pluralistic politics," which is defined as the concept traditionally held in this country that politics function within a clash of interests, sectional and group, and that political decisions are best understood as compromises between these clashing interests. Our democratic society has difficulty coping with ideologues because they endanger pluralistic politics in three ways: by closing the political process to their opposition, by transferring essentially political conflicts into nonpolitical areas, and by impairing democratic discussion. Further, the overriding reason for the anti-pluralism of ideologues is that they are more attached to their ideology than to the democratic process, an attachment demanded by the intertwining of the epistemology and personality. (RN) 
650 1 7 |a Democratic Values.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Moral Values.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Persuasive Discourse.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Political Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Political Influences.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Political Issues.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Rhetoric.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Social Attitudes.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Values.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Values.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Gonchar, Ruth M. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED079786.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65070495  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 4  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 6299a913-ca06-50f8-99e0-19179621f6a4  |s a13ef452-4dde-5b74-a574-fa511a722cb4 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED079786  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1