When Are Undergraduate Admissions Sexist? [electronic resource] : The Case of Stanford University / Aimee Dorr Leifer.
This document discusses sexist undergraduate admissions. Three primary strategies are presented to make admission less sexist. These strategies suggest: (1) the undergraduate structure can be changed so that more places are open to women; (2) undergraduate institutions can actively recruit qualified...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via ERIC) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1974.
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | This document discusses sexist undergraduate admissions. Three primary strategies are presented to make admission less sexist. These strategies suggest: (1) the undergraduate structure can be changed so that more places are open to women; (2) undergraduate institutions can actively recruit qualified women applicants; and (3) undergraduate institutions can change their review procedures. (MJM) |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | ERIC Document Number: ED095740. ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Symposium on Academic/Professional Women in Communication and Related Fields, International Communication Association (New Orleans, Louisiana, April 1974). Educational level discussed: Higher Education. |
| Physical Description: | 10 p. |