Awareness and Response Style in the Acquisition of a Verbal Behavior [electronic resource] / Don-David Lusterman.

The effects of individual personality differences and awareness of experimental demands on the acquisition of a verbal behavior were investigated. Awareness was determined by a recognition task. The personality variable was a measure of the agreeing response set to Likert-scaled personality items. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Lusterman, Don-David
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1974.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6521245
003 CoU
005 20081118081343.9
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 740401s1974 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed097378 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED097378 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED097378 
100 1 |a Lusterman, Don-David. 
245 1 0 |a Awareness and Response Style in the Acquisition of a Verbal Behavior  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Don-David Lusterman. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1974. 
300 |a 17 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED097378. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (59th, Chicago, Illinois, April 1974).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a The effects of individual personality differences and awareness of experimental demands on the acquisition of a verbal behavior were investigated. Awareness was determined by a recognition task. The personality variable was a measure of the agreeing response set to Likert-scaled personality items. Subjects were grouped as extreme or moderate responders. The tendency to respond extremely was viewed as a type of deviant behavior, related to other nonconforming behavior, and growing out of early socialization patterns. Unaware subjects showed no performance gains, which is consistent with a cognitive viewpoint. Among aware subjects, moderates showed high performance gains, while extremes showed only small gains. A breakdown of extremes into highs (yeasayers) and lows (naysayers) revealed that 77 percent of the yeasayers and 33 percent of the nay sayers became aware, as compared to 50 percent of the moderates. These findings were discussed in terms of the need to consider individual differences in the statement of general behavioral laws. (Author) 
650 0 7 |a Analysis of Variance.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Individual Differences.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Perception.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Personality Measures.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Response Style (Tests)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Verbal Stimuli.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED097378.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65212459  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 8ec2b08e-8fcb-5590-a6d4-75f671e13cb4  |s 78616b19-30cc-5e4c-b65e-6327f0f4414a 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED097378  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1