The Psychological Burden of Proof [electronic resource] : Or, Deviations from Whately's Theory of Presumption in Modern Texts on Argumentation and Debate / J. Michael Sproule.

This paper argues that the concept of presumption and burden of proof as developed in twentieth century argumentation texts is distinct from the theory developed and perfected by Whately in his "Elements of Rhetoric." The first section of this paper reviews the concepts of presumption and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Sproule, J. Michael
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1974.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6524760
003 CoU
005 20080221101429.3
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 741201s1974 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed101408 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED101408 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED101408 
100 1 |a Sproule, J. Michael. 
245 1 4 |a The Psychological Burden of Proof  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Or, Deviations from Whately's Theory of Presumption in Modern Texts on Argumentation and Debate /  |c J. Michael Sproule. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1974. 
300 |a 29 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED101408. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (Chicago, Illinois, December 1974).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a This paper argues that the concept of presumption and burden of proof as developed in twentieth century argumentation texts is distinct from the theory developed and perfected by Whately in his "Elements of Rhetoric." The first section of this paper reviews the concepts of presumption and burden of proof as described by Whately, examining how the theory evolved and became more psychologically based. The second section reviews the development of presumption and burden of proof in 26 argumentation texts, showing how presumption is treated with either nonexistent or circumscribed attention to the psychological aspects of presumption. It is concluded from a comparison of Whately's theory to the applications of these concepts in twentieth century argumentation and debate texts that the assumed relationship between the two is generally not valid. (TS) 
650 0 7 |a Communication (Thought Transfer)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Debate.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Persuasive Discourse.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Psychology.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Rhetoric.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Speech Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Theories.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED101408.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65247607  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-22-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 4  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i f106e6ad-0fb2-5d7b-9ccb-a7d74b2cf884  |s e6da1884-e77f-526b-b041-9622a5022fdf 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED101408  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1