A Dissemination System for State Accountability Programs [electronic resource] : Part 3: Developing Dissemination Procedures for State Educational Accountability Programs / Erwin P. Bettinghaus and Gerald R. Miller.

Some systematic procedures are suggested that can be utilized by states as they move toward the development of educational accountability programs. Each of the steps outlined: (1) identification of the appropriate message sources, (2) specification of communication objectives, (3) analysis of releva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Bettinghaus, Erwin P.
Corporate Author: Cooperative Accountability Project
Other Authors: Miller, Gerald R.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6533639
003 CoU
005 20090120104508.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 730601s1973 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed111843 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED111843 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED111843 
100 1 |a Bettinghaus, Erwin P. 
245 1 2 |a A Dissemination System for State Accountability Programs  |h [electronic resource] :  |b Part 3: Developing Dissemination Procedures for State Educational Accountability Programs /  |c Erwin P. Bettinghaus and Gerald R. Miller. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1973. 
300 |a 76 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED111843. 
500 |a Availability: State Educational Accountability Repository, Wisconsin Dept. of Public Instruction, Madison, Wisconsin 53702 (Free while supplies last).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Note: For a related document, see ED 091 840; Parts 1 and 2 of this document are TM 004 808 and 809; Best copy available.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Some systematic procedures are suggested that can be utilized by states as they move toward the development of educational accountability programs. Each of the steps outlined: (1) identification of the appropriate message sources, (2) specification of communication objectives, (3) analysis of relevant publics, (4) determination of particular dissemination techniques, and (5) evaluation of communication outcomes is an essential ingredient of a recipe calculated to produce maximum communication effectiveness. While each procedure is discussed serially and in detail, it must be remembered that communication within large, complex organizations is not a linear process; it is an interactive process. Careful analysis and reseach may help insure the eventual success of an information dissemination program about state accountability models. Some of the major questions that must be asked if a successful dissemination model is to be developed are specified. For a state department of education to be able to answer some of these questions, however, will demand the systematic collection of data that does not seem to be currently available. (RC) 
650 1 7 |a Accountability.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Attitude Change.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Communication (Thought Transfer)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Information Dissemination.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Models.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a News Media.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Objectives.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Public Opinion.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Social Action.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a State Departments of Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a State Programs.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Miller, Gerald R. 
710 2 |a Cooperative Accountability Project. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED111843.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65336392  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 2  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 055925d6-ff15-5662-a477-feb9205166a0  |s 4d88566b-ac4f-502a-b0e0-0ad9e9e8280f 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED111843  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1