A Comparison of Emrick and Adam's Mastery-Learning Test Model with Kriewall's Criterion-Referenced Test Model [electronic resource] / Ronald Besel.
The assumptions of the Criterion-Referenced Test (CRT) model proposed by Kriewall are compared to those of Emrick and Adam's Mastery-Learning (ML) model. Testing, in the context of instructional management, serves three general purposes: performance evaluation (achievement of objectives), place...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via ERIC) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l.] :
Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,
1971.
|
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a22000002u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b6533640 | ||
| 003 | CoU | ||
| 005 | 20090120104508.7 | ||
| 006 | m d f | ||
| 007 | cr un | ||
| 008 | 710421s1971 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ERIC)ed111844 | ||
| 040 | |a ericd |c ericd |d MvI | ||
| 088 | |a SWRL-TM-5-71-04 | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED111844 | ||
| 099 | |f ERIC DOC # |a ED111844 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Besel, Ronald. | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Comparison of Emrick and Adam's Mastery-Learning Test Model with Kriewall's Criterion-Referenced Test Model |h [electronic resource] / |c Ronald Besel. |
| 260 | |a [S.l.] : |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, |c 1971. | ||
| 300 | |a 17 p. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Document Number: ED111844. | ||
| 500 | |a ERIC Note: For related documents, see TM 004 812 and 814. |5 ericd. | ||
| 520 | |a The assumptions of the Criterion-Referenced Test (CRT) model proposed by Kriewall are compared to those of Emrick and Adam's Mastery-Learning (ML) model. Testing, in the context of instructional management, serves three general purposes: performance evaluation (achievement of objectives), placement (classification of students for instruction), and diagnosis of learning deficiencies. Both of the test models discussed here assess the achievement of objectives; they differ in the types of objectives for which they are best suited. Both test models have potential usefulness for making placement decisions, but only the ML model is likely to be useful in diagnosing learning deficiencies. The applicability of each model for instructional management decisions is discussed. (Author/DEP) | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Bayesian Statistics. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Comparative Analysis. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Criterion Referenced Tests. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Cutting Scores. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Decision Making. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Educational Diagnosis. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Grouping (Instructional Purposes) |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Mastery Tests. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 1 | 7 | |a Mathematical Models. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Probability. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Psychometrics. |2 ericd. |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Test Interpretation. |2 ericd. |
| 710 | 2 | |a Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research and Development. | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED111844.pdf |z Full Text (via ERIC) |
| 907 | |a .b65336409 |b 07-06-22 |c 10-19-10 | ||
| 998 | |a web |b 10-22-12 |c f |d m |e - |f eng |g xx |h 2 |i 1 | ||
| 956 | |a ERIC | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i 2b4697b8-bc8c-59b5-83f7-e9fd9658a12a |s c7fe5ee8-ba90-5e55-a24f-c164612dff70 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e ED111844 |h Other scheme |i web |n 1 |