Additional Considerations in Determining Sample Size [electronic resource] / Joel R. Levin and Michael J. Subkoviak.

Levin's (1975) sample-size determination procedure for completely randomized analysis of variance designs is extended to designs in which antecedent or blocking variables information is considered. In particular, a researcher's choice of designs is framed in terms of determining the respec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Levin, Joel R.
Corporate Author: Wisconsin Univ., Madison. Department of Educational Psychology
Other Authors: Subkoviak, Michael J.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1975.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6541063
003 CoU
005 20081118081430.0
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 750101s1975 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed121603 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
088 |a Occas-Pap-10 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED121603 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED121603 
100 1 |a Levin, Joel R. 
245 1 0 |a Additional Considerations in Determining Sample Size  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Joel R. Levin and Michael J. Subkoviak. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1975. 
300 |a 17 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED121603. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, California, April 19-23, 1976).  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Levin's (1975) sample-size determination procedure for completely randomized analysis of variance designs is extended to designs in which antecedent or blocking variables information is considered. In particular, a researcher's choice of designs is framed in terms of determining the respective sample sizes necessary to detect specified contrasts of a given magnitude with given Type I and Type II errors. A solution is provided for dealing with real-world considerations in which errors of measurement cannot be neglected. A worked example presents an instance wherein a blocking strategy is clearly advantageous assuming infallible measuring instruments, but not when the same instruments are granted fallibility. (Author/SD) 
650 0 7 |a Analysis of Variance.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Data Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Data Collection.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Educational Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Sample Size.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Sampling.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Statistical Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Subkoviak, Michael J. 
710 2 |a Wisconsin Univ., Madison. Department of Educational Psychology. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED121603.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b65410634  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-19-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-19-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i f5677a8c-061e-5ab5-a73d-dff40dda783d  |s 39e0dfdf-c595-5838-b198-c4e46a148c2e 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED121603  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1