The Irving judgment : David Irving v. Penguin Books and Professor Deborah Lipstadt.
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Patrons must make an appointment to view Lib Use Only items |
---|---|
Other title: | Harry W. Mazal Holocaust Collection. |
Format: | Book |
Language: | English |
Donor: | Gift of Jerry Mazal, 2014. |
Local Note: | Archives copy Harry W. Mazal Holocaust Collection. |
Published: |
London :
Penguin,
2000.
|
Subjects: |
Table of Contents:
- The words complained of and their meaning
- The nature of Irving's claim for damages
- The defence of justification: an overview
- Justification: the defendants' historiographical criticisms of Irving's portrayal of Hitler in particular regard to his attitude towards the Jewish question
- Justification: Evidence of the attitude of Hitler towards the Jews and of the extent, if any, of his knowledge of and responsibility for the evolving policy of extermination
- Auschwitz
- Justification: the claim that Irving is a 'Holocaust denier'
- Justification: the allegation that Irving is an anti-Semite and a racist
- Justification: the claim that Irving associates with right-wing extremists
- Justification: the bombing of Dresden
- Justification: Irving's conduct in relation to the Goebbels diaries in the Moscow archive
- Findings on justification
- Verdict.