Excited Utterances, "Testimonial" Statements, and the Confrontation Clause [electronic resource]
Reviews two Supreme Court cases, Hammon v. Indiana and Davis v. Washington, concerning the admissibility of "excited utterance" statements made by non-testifying witnesses at criminal trials. Provides background on the rules of evidence and hearsay, excited utterances, and interpretation o...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via ProQuest) |
|---|---|
| Corporate Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[S.l] :
[s.n.],
2005.
|
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000001a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | b9425240 | ||
| 003 | CoU | ||
| 006 | m o d f | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 101203s2005 dcu o f000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | |a crs200404705 | ||
| 040 | |a UMI |c UMI | ||
| 049 | |a GDWR | ||
| 099 | |a CRS-2005-AML-0340 | ||
| 099 | |a CRS-2005-AML-0340 | ||
| 110 | 2 | |a Library of Congress. |b Congressional Research Service. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Excited Utterances, "Testimonial" Statements, and the Confrontation Clause |h [electronic resource] |
| 260 | |a [S.l] : |b [s.n.], |c 2005. | ||
| 300 | |a 12 p., digital, PDF file. | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent. | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia. | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier. | ||
| 500 | |a Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Dec. 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC. | ||
| 500 | |a CRS Report. | ||
| 520 | |a Reviews two Supreme Court cases, Hammon v. Indiana and Davis v. Washington, concerning the admissibility of "excited utterance" statements made by non-testifying witnesses at criminal trials. Provides background on the rules of evidence and hearsay, excited utterances, and interpretation of the Sixth Amendment confrontation clause in the Crawford v. Washington case. Describes three general approaches that lower courts have used to classify whether excited utterances can be classified as "testimonial," including per se non-testimonial, per se testimonial, and case-by-case evaluation. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Judge-made law. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Constitutional law. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Criminal procedure. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Microfiche version: |a Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. |t Excited Utterances, "Testimonial" Statements, and the Confrontation Clause. |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://congressional.proquest.com/congcomp/getdoc?CRDC-ID=CRS-2005-AML-0340 |z Full Text (via ProQuest) |
| 907 | |a .b94252403 |b 03-08-23 |c 08-21-17 | ||
| 998 | |a web |b 08-21-17 |c f |d m |e p |f eng |g dcu |h 0 |i 2 | ||
| 956 | |a Proquest Congressional: Research B | ||
| 948 | |a reloaded for deduplication project 8/1/2018 lew | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i 605e767b-e720-5e54-b6ad-d78a0c65c523 |s 9364167a-852d-5e12-9afe-62c8aabd84d0 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Online |c Online |d Online |e CRS-2005-AML-0340 |h Other scheme |i web |n 1 |