|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Mu 4500 |
| 001 |
b9589135 |
| 003 |
CoU |
| 005 |
20170929044252.7 |
| 006 |
m o d |
| 007 |
cr ||||||||||| |
| 008 |
151010s1900 dcu o 000 0 eng d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9780309586320
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 0309586321
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)ebqac923261099
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)923261099
|
| 037 |
|
|
|a ebqac3376093
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a EBLCP
|b eng
|e pn
|c EBLCP
|d OCLCQ
|d MERUC
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a GWRE
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a Q11.M24
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation.
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Washington :
|b National Academies Press,
|c 1900.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource (176 pages)
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent.
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia.
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier.
|
| 505 |
0 |
|
|a ""MAJOR AWARD DECISIONMAKING AT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION""; ""Copyright""; ""Preface""; ""Contents""; ""Executive Summary""; ""BACKGROUND""; ""FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS""; ""Clear Rules of the Game""; ""Primacy of Technical Merit""; ""Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff""; ""Public Documentation of Decisionmaking""; ""More Stringent Setting of Priorities""; ""RECOMMENDATIONS""; ""Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards""; ""Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning""
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a ""Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria""""Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion""; ""Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion""; ""Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process""; ""Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload""; ""Recommendation 8: Planning the Review Process and Criteria""; ""Recommendation 9: More and Better Public Documentation of Award Decisions""; ""Recommendation 10: More Recompetitions""; ""1 Major Awards at NSF ""; ""OVERVIEW OF MAJOR AWARDS""; ""MAJOR AWARDS AND MERIT REVIEW""
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a ""MAJOR AWARDS AND THE NSB""""NSF ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING FOR MERIT REVIEW""; ""OVERALL CONCLUSIONS""; ""Clear Rules of the Game""; ""Primacy of Technical Merit""; ""Appropriate Roles of Peer Reviewers and Staff""; ""Public Documentation of Decisionmaking""; ""More Stringent Setting of Priorities""; ""2 Planning Major Projects ""; ""BACKGROUND: PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING AT NSF""; ""Long-Range Planning at NSF""; ""Annual Budget Process""; ""MAJOR PROJECT PLANNING AND BUDGETING""; ""Capital Facilities Planning""; ""FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING AND BUDGETING""; ""Findings""
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a ""Recommendations""""Recommendation 1: Justification for Major Project Awards""; ""Recommendation 2: Involvement and Support of the Research Community in Planning""; ""3 Awarding Major Projects: Criteria and Review Procedures ""; ""BACKGROUND: THE MERIT REVIEW PROCESS AT NSF""; ""Current Review Criteria""; ""Review and Selection Criteria for Major Project Awards""; ""Findings and Recommendations on Criteria""; ""Recommendation 3: Primacy of Technical Merit Criteria""; ""Recommendation 4: Human Resource Development and Equal Opportunity as a Criterion""
|
| 505 |
8 |
|
|a ""Recommendation 5: Cost Sharing as a Criterion""""NSF PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING PROPOSALS""; ""Proposal Review Process""; ""Peer Review Modes""; ""Selection of Reviewers""; ""Policies and Procedures for Dealing with Bias and Conflict of Interest""; ""Award Decisionmaking""; ""Findings and Recommendations on Review Procedures""; ""Recommendation 6: A Two-Phase Merit Review Process""; ""4 Awarding Major Projects: NSB Role, Review Process Design, and Decision Documentation ""; ""NSB ROLE AND PROCEDURES""; ""Findings and Recommendations on the NSB Role""
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a ""Recommendation 7: Reorienting the NSB Workload""
|
| 588 |
0 |
|
|a Print version record.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Staff, National Academy of Engineering.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Staff, Institute of Medicine.
|
| 776 |
0 |
8 |
|i Print version:
|a Staff, National Academy of Sciences.
|t Major Award Decisionmaking at the National Science Foundation.
|d Washington : National Academies Press, ©1900
|z 9780309050296.
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucb/detail.action?docID=3376093
|z Full Text (via ProQuest)
|
| 907 |
|
|
|a .b95891353
|b 07-02-19
|c 10-03-17
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a web
|b - -
|c f
|d b
|e z
|f eng
|g dcu
|h 0
|i 1
|
| 956 |
|
|
|a Ebook Central Academic Complete
|
| 956 |
|
|
|b Ebook Central Academic Complete
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 11b74f58-46c5-5c9f-b881-0df71457ab69
|s 8797985c-57ca-5322-a7b1-9d9f92b4e3f2
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p Can circulate
|a University of Colorado Boulder
|b Online
|c Online
|d Online
|e Q11.M24
|h Library of Congress classification
|i web
|n 1
|
