From courtroom to clinic : legal cases that changed mental health treatment / edited by Peter Ash.
Why do present-day mental health professionals practice the way that they do? Over the past fifty years, a number of landmark court holdings have changed such basic principles as what material is confidential, how civil commitment and involuntary treatment are conducted, and when a therapist has a d...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via Cambridge) |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge :
Cambridge University Press,
2019.
|
| Subjects: |
Table of Contents:
- Raising American standards in the treatment of persons with mental illness Wyatt vs. Stickney (1972) / Susan Hatters Friedman
- The limits of hospitalization after commitment O'Connor vs. Donaldson (1975) / Deborah Giorgi-Guarnieri
- Who speaks for the children? : Parham vs. J.L & J.R. (1979) / Peter Ash
- The right to refuse treatment : Rogers vs. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health (1983) / Alec Buchanan
- The least restrictive alternative : Olmstead vs. L.C. & E.W. (1999) / Megan Testa
- Informed consent : Canterbury vs. Spence (1972) / Debra A. Pinals
- End of life decision making : Cruzan vs. Director, Missouri Department of Health (1990) / Richard Martinez
- Prohibiting psychiatrist-patient sex : Roy vs. Hartogs (1976) / Jacob M. Appel
- Psychotherapist-patient privilege : Jaffee vs. Redmond (1996) / Jacob M. Appel
- Protecting others from dangerous patients : Tarasoff vs. Regents of the University of California (1976) / Phillip J. Resnick
- The insanity defense : US vs. Hinckley (1982) / Alan W. Newman.