Justifying strict liability : a comparative analysis in legal reasoning / Marco Cappelletti.

The imposition of strict liability in tort law is controversial, and its theoretical foundations are the object of vigorous debate. Why do or should we impose strict liability on employers for the torts committed by their employees, or on a person for the harm caused by their children, animals, acti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ProQuest)
Main Author: Cappelletti, Marco, 1986- (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2022.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000001i 4500
001 in00000096231
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 220331s2022 enk o 001 0 eng d
005 20240529230334.7
019 |a 1306522314  |a 1336404536 
020 |a 9780191953170  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0191953172  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0192676067 
020 |a 9780192676061  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |z 0192859862 
020 |z 9780192859860 
035 |a (OCoLC)ebc1306273828 
035 |a (OCoLC)1306273828  |z (OCoLC)1306522314  |z (OCoLC)1336404536 
037 |a ebc7033265 
040 |a YDX  |b eng  |e rda  |c YDX  |d OH1  |d SFB  |d GZL  |d EBLCP  |d UAB  |d N$T  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCO 
049 |a GWRE 
050 4 |a K948  |b .C26 2022 
100 1 |a Cappelletti, Marco,  |d 1986-  |e author.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2022137931  |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000493556410 
245 1 0 |a Justifying strict liability :  |b a comparative analysis in legal reasoning /  |c Marco Cappelletti. 
264 1 |a Oxford ;  |a New York :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2022. 
300 |a 1 online resource 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The imposition of strict liability in tort law is controversial, and its theoretical foundations are the object of vigorous debate. Why do or should we impose strict liability on employers for the torts committed by their employees, or on a person for the harm caused by their children, animals, activities, or things? In responding to this type of questions, legal actors rely on a wide variety of justifications. Justifying Strict Liability explores, in a comparative perspective, the most significant arguments that are put forward to justify the imposition of strict liability in four legal systems, two common law, England and the United States, and two civil law, France and Italy. These justifications include: risk, accident avoidance, the 'deep pockets' argument, loss-spreading, victim protection, reduction in administrative costs, and individual responsibility. By looking at how these arguments are used across the four legal systems, this book considers a variety of patterns which characterise the reasoning on strict liability. The book also assesses the justificatory weight of the arguments, showing that these can assume varying significance in the four jurisdictions and that such variations reflect different views as to the values and goals which inspire strict liability and tort law more generally. Overall, the book seeks to improve our understanding of strict liability, to shed light on the justifications for its imposition, and to enhance our understanding of the different tort cultures featuring in the four legal systems studied. 
650 0 |a Strict liability.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85128724 
650 0 |a Torts.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85136182 
650 7 |a Strict liability.  |2 fast 
650 7 |a Torts.  |2 fast 
776 0 8 |i Print version:  |z 0192859862  |z 9780192859860  |w (OCoLC)1302988781 
856 4 0 |u http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucb/detail.action?docID=7033265  |z Full Text (via ProQuest) 
915 |a 1 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
948 |a May 2024 ebook central cleanup, msw. 
956 |a Ebook Central 
956 |b Ebook Central Perpetual Titles 
994 |a 92  |b COD 
998 |b Added to collection pqebk.perpetual 
999 f f |s e3a231c9-e469-4c1a-bccc-ca63fd0ee946  |i aa100739-4b41-47fb-9797-226dfc345537 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e K948 .C26 2022  |h Library of Congress classification  |i web