The Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, also known as the Oneida Nation of New York, also known as the Oneida Indians of New York, and the Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, also known as the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Inc., appellants, v. The County of Oneida, New York, and the County of Madison, New York, appellees : no. 720, docket 72-1029.
Case summary: Action by the Oneida Indian Nations of New York State and Wisconsin challenging sale of tribal lands as violating Indian treaties and the Indian Non-Intercourse Act. The Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal for lack of federal question jurisdiction.
Saved in:
| Corporate Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Other title: | Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida. Getches case collection. West's Federal reporter |
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
[St. Paul :
West Pub. Co.,
1972]
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | Case summary: Action by the Oneida Indian Nations of New York State and Wisconsin challenging sale of tribal lands as violating Indian treaties and the Indian Non-Intercourse Act. The Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal for lack of federal question jurisdiction. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Caption title. Extract from the Federal reporter, v. 464. "United States Court of Appeals, Second District. Argued June 5, 1972. Decided July 12, 1972"--P. 916. David Getches served as an attorney in this case. |
| Physical Description: | Case on p. 916-925. |
| Terms Governing Use and Reproduction Note: | Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. |
| Preferred Citation of Described Materials Note: | Citation: Oneida Indian Nation v. Cnty. of Oneida, 464 F.2d 916 (2d Cir. 1972) (Charles Donaldson, Syracuse, N. Y., of counsel, American Civil Liberties Union and David H. Getches, Boulder Colo., and Peter J. Aschenbrenner, of counsel, Native American Rights Fund, for appellants, amicus curiae) |