State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief relating thereto of the State of Nevada.

Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details

Corporate Authors:	Arizona (Complainant), California (Defendant), Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.) (Defendant), Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.) (Defendant), Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.) (Defendant), Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.) (Defendant), Los Angeles (Calif.) (Defendant), San Diego (Calif.) (Defendant), San Diego County (Calif.) (Defendant), United States (intervener.), Nevada (intervener.), New Mexico (party.), Utah (party.), United States. Supreme Court
Other Authors:	Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995 (special master.), Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001, Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997, Corker, Charles E., Nelson, Gilbert F., Gindler, Burton J., Alexander, John R., Sondheim, Harry B., Codon, Iryne, Moore, Prentiss, McCarty, Robert L., Wheatley, Charles F., Muys, Jerome C., Hufstedler, Shirley M., Jenney, Francis E., Lagerlof, Stanley C., Horton, Harry W., Knox, R. L., Redwine, Earl, Howard, James H., Cooper, Charles C., Jr, Keith, Donald M., Hutchinson, H. Kenneth, Doherty, Frank P., Arnebergh, Roger, Tillman, Gilmore, Mathews, John H., Du Paul, J. F., Keller, James Don, Berrey, Robert G.
Other title:	Bound in: Response of California defendants, June 1, 1959, to findings, conclusions, and briefs proposed by other parties, April 1, 1959. At head of title: In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original. In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief relating thereto of the State of Nevada. In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners : State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master : response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief relating thereto of the State of Nevada. Response of the California defendants to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and brief relating thereto of the State of Nevada, June 1, 1959, Arizona v. California. Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963) Arizona vs. California. Arizona v. California collection. Arizona v. California collection : California records and briefs.
Format:	Book
Language:	English
Published:	[United States] : [publisher not identified], [1959]
Subjects:	Water rights > Southwest, New. Water-supply > Southwest, New. Water consumption > Southwest, New. Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico) > Water rights.