State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : response of complainant State of Arizona to defendants' motion to join as parties the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.
Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in D...
Saved in:
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | lb621158 | ||
| 003 | CoU-L | ||
| 008 | 840405s1954 xxu 000 0 eng d | ||
| 005 | 20240201204555.5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)10598081 | ||
| 035 | |a .b6211586 |b multi |c - | ||
| 040 | |a CLA |b eng |c CLA |d UDI |d OCLCQ |d UCX |d UtOrBLW | ||
| 043 | |a n-ust-- | ||
| 049 | |a UCXA | ||
| 090 | |a KF5590.C6 |b A5757 Arizona 1954a | ||
| 110 | 1 | |a Arizona, |e complainant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79034873 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : |b United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : response of complainant State of Arizona to defendants' motion to join as parties the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. |
| 246 | 1 | |i At head of title: |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1954, no. 10, original. | |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1954, no. 10, original : |b State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California and County of San Diego, California, defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : response of complainant State of Arizona to defendants' motion to join as parties the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1954, no. 10, original : |b State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California ... [et al.], defendants : United States of America, intervener : State of Nevada, intervener : response of complainant State of Arizona to defendants' motion to join as parties the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Response of complainant State of Arizona to defendants' motion to join as parties the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, Arizona v. California. |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963) |
| 264 | 1 | |a [United States] : |b [publisher not identified], |c [1954?] | |
| 300 | |a 19 pages ; |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent. | ||
| 337 | |a unmediated |b n |2 rdamedia. | ||
| 338 | |a volume |b nc |2 rdacarrier. | ||
| 590 | |a Law Library's copy has "Filed Aug 13 1954" stamped at top of cover. | ||
| 500 | |a Cover title. | ||
| 500 | |a Attorneys listed on cover: John H. Moeur, Burr Sutter, Theodore Kiendl, Perry M. Ling, Ross F. Jones, Howard F. Thompson. | ||
| 520 | |a Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."-- Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author) | ||
| 524 | |a Citation: Response of Complainant State of Arizona to Defendants’ Motion to Join as Parties the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming., Arizona v. California, No. 10, Original, 1954 Term (U.S. filed Aug. 13, 1954) | ||
| 524 | |a Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963) | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Water rights |z Southwest, New. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Water-supply |z Southwest, New. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Water consumption |z Southwest, New. | |
| 651 | 0 | |a Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico) |x Water rights. | |
| 730 | 0 | |a Arizona vs. California. | |
| 730 | 0 | |a Arizona v. California collection. | |
| 730 | 0 | |a Arizona v. California collection : Arizona records and briefs. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Moeur, John H. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sutter, Burr. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2021071875 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kiendl, Theodore. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ling, Perry M. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jones, Ross F. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Thompson, Howard F. | |
| 710 | 1 | |a California, |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79041717 |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000121800988 | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82200232 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82054971 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79054027 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n80158367 |1 http://isni.org/isni/0000000121164707 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a Los Angeles (Calif.), |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79021240 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a San Diego (Calif.), |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79056560 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a San Diego County (Calif.), |e defendant. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006415 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a United States, |e intervener. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n78095330 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a Nevada, |e intervener. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79072716 | |
| 710 | 1 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court. |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79006848 |1 http://isni.org/isni/000000012176610X | |
| 902 | |a 220725 | ||
| 944 | |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED | ||
| 945 | |l llawp |u v.electronic | ||
| 945 | |l lst1 | ||
| 994 | |a (2)lst1 |a (2)llawp | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i b1e69a3d-44f5-5b00-9fc9-c23ef92dd95f |s cc77751e-599b-55bf-8f49-4268642b5362 |
| 999 | |b 4 |c 130705 |d m |e a |f - |g 0 | ||
| 952 | f | f | |p Cannot circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Law Campus |c Law |d Law Library - Stacks 1st floor |e KF5590.C6 A5757 Arizona 1954a |h Library of Congress classification |i journal |m U182004713574 |n 1 |