Rethinking statutory antiwaver provisions following the Lloyd's of London litigation / Mark J. Loewenstein.
In the Lloyd’s of London cases, the United States Courts of Appeals upheld certain forum-selection clauses that effectually deprived investors of the protections of the federal securities laws as if the investors had expressly waived those protections. This article examines statutory antiwaiver prov...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other title: | Securities regulation law journal. |
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Boston :
Warren, Gorham & Lamont,
1999.
|
| Series: | Securities regulation law journal ;
v. 27, no. 1 (Spring 1999) |
| Subjects: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | lb643962 | ||
| 003 | CoU-L | ||
| 008 | eng | ||
| 035 | |a Brief bib | ||
| 035 | |a .b6439627 |b lrare |c - | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Loewenstein, Mark J. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking statutory antiwaver provisions following the Lloyd's of London litigation / |c Mark J. Loewenstein. |
| 260 | |a Boston : |b Warren, Gorham & Lamont, |c 1999. | ||
| 300 | |a Article on p. 48-73. | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Securities regulation law journal ; |v v. 27, no. 1 (Spring 1999) | |
| 500 | |a Article contained in the Vol. 27, no. 1 (Spring 1999) issue of Securities regulation law journal. | ||
| 520 | |a In the Lloyd’s of London cases, the United States Courts of Appeals upheld certain forum-selection clauses that effectually deprived investors of the protections of the federal securities laws as if the investors had expressly waived those protections. This article examines statutory antiwaiver provisions in light of the Lloyd’s cases, exploring the effect those provisions have on the administration of the federal securities laws, and suggests that the law be amended to allow contractual waiver in certain circumstances. | ||
| 524 | |a Citation: Mark J. Loewenstein, Rethinking Statutory Antiwaver Provisions Following the Lloyd's of London Litigation, 27 Sec. Reg. L.J. 48 (1999) | ||
| 540 | |a Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Securities |z United States. | |
| 730 | 0 | |a Securities regulation law journal. | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Securities regulation law journal. |g Vol. 27, no. 1 (Spring 1999) | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Securities regulation law journal ; |v v. 27, no. 1 (Spring 1999) | |
| 902 | |a 230309 | ||
| 999 | |b 0 |c 111231 |d m |e a |f - |g 0 | ||
| 994 | |a lrare | ||
| 945 | |l lrare |a FACULTY PUB Loewenstein Article 1999 | ||
| 999 | f | f | |i 857fe5bd-fc5c-5b6a-978f-826ba911c096 |s b6796deb-e860-51c4-8617-195ca685edc6 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Cannot circulate |a University of Colorado Boulder |b Law Campus |c Law |d Law Library - Rare Books basement |e FACULTY PUB Loewenstein Article 1999 |h Other scheme |i journal |m U182004876495 |n 1 |