In the Supreme Court of the United States, California, et. al, petitioners, v. Texas, et al., respondents ; Texas, et al., petitioners, v. California, et al., respondents [electronic resource] : on writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit : brief for the National Women's Law Center, National Partnership for Women & Families, Black Women's Health Imperative, American Medical Women's Association, and 77 additional organizations as amici curiae supporting petitioners in no. 19-840 / James A. Santos, counsel of record [and 12 others], counsel for amici curiae.
The questions presented are: once the penalty for not buying health insurance has been set to zero, is the ACA's individual mandate unconstitutional and if so, is it severable from the remainder of the ACA? This brief focusses on Indian-specific provisions of the ACA.
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full Text (via HeinOnline) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Corporate Authors: | , , , , |
| Other title: | HeinOnline index title: Brief amici curiae of National Women's Law Center, et al. HeinOnline women and the law. |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Washington, D.C. :
Wilson-Epes Printing Co., Inc.,
[2020]
|
| Subjects: |
| Summary: | The questions presented are: once the penalty for not buying health insurance has been set to zero, is the ACA's individual mandate unconstitutional and if so, is it severable from the remainder of the ACA? This brief focusses on Indian-specific provisions of the ACA. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | "Nos. 19-840 and 19-1019." "May 13, 2020." |
| Physical Description: | 1 online resource (xxii, 38, 5a pages) |
| Bibliography: | "Table of authorities": Pages iii-xxii. |
| Source of Description, Etc. Note: | Description based on PDF title page, viewed July 22, 2021. |