Feminist judgments : corporate law rewritten / edited by Anne M. Choike (Michigan State University College of Law), Usha R. Rodrigues (University of Georgia School of Law), Kelli Alces Williams (Florida State University).
"The modern American public corporation stands at the center of various forms of inequality in our society-because of its influence on the economy, the environment, and the government as well as its own employees and consumers. But corporate law has long overlooked the feminist perspective, to...
Saved in:
| Other Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other title: | Feminist judgments (Corporate law rewritten) Corporate law rewritten |
| Format: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY :
Cambridge University Press,
2023.
|
| Series: | Feminist judgments series.
|
| Subjects: |
Table of Contents:
- Part I. Introduction and overview. 1. Introduction to the feminist judgments : corporate law rewritten project / Anne M. Choike, Usha R. Rodrigues, and Kelli Alces Williams
- Part II. Legal personality, identity, and limited liability of corporate entities. 2. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) / Commentary: Amy Sepinwall, Judgment: Carliss Chatman
- 3. Walkovzsky v. Carlton, 223 N.E.2d 6 (N.Y. 1966) / Commentary: Janis Sarra and Cheryl Wade, Judgment: Poonam Puri and Ankita Gupta
- Part III. Role and purpose of the corporation and corporate combinations in society. 4. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919) / Commentary: Jena Martin, Judgment: Barnali Choudhury
- 5. Merriam v. Demoulas Super Mkts., 985 N.E.2d 388 (Mass. 2013) / Commentary: Sunitha Malepati, Judgment: Alicia E. Plerhoples
- 6. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986) / Commentary: Afra Afsharipour, Judgment: Christina Sautter
- 7. Agreement between Harvey Weinstein and The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC, as of October 20, 2015 / Commentary: Alexandra Andhov, Contract: Susan Chesler
- Part IV. Fiduciary duties in corporate governance. 8. Meinhard v. Salmon, 164 N.E. 545 (N.Y. 1928) / Commentary: Christina Hurt, Judgment: Dalia Tsuk Mitchell
- 9. Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) / Commentary: Virginia Harper Ho, Judgment: Lua Kamál Yuille
- 10. White v. Panic, 783 A.2d 543 (Del. 2001) / Commentary: Kellye Testy, Judgment: Sarah Haan
- 11. Francis v. United Jersey Bank, 432 A.2d 814 (N.J. 1981) / Commentary: Faith Stevelman, Judgment: Jonathan W. Smith
- 12. In re The Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation, 906 A.2d 27 (Del. 2006) / Commentary: Laura Rosenbury, Judgment: Hillary Sale
- Part V. Closely held businesses and other considerations regarding the composition of boards, management, and owners. 13. Ringling Bros-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Ringling, 53 A.2d 441 (Del. 1947) / Commentary: Gabriel Rauterberg, Judgment: Benjamin Means
- 14. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype, 328 N.E.2d 505 (Mass. 1975) / Commentary: Jessica Kiser, Judgment: Cindy Schipani
- Part VI. Protecting investors and potential investors in corporations. 15. SEC v. W. J. Howey Co. et al., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) / Commentary: Kristin Johnson and Carla Reyes, Judgment: Theresa Gabaldon
- 16. U.S. v. Chestman, 947 F.2d 551 (2d Cir., 1991) / Commentary: Donna M. Nagy, Judgment: Karen Woody
- Part VII. From foundations to future directions. 17. The importance of incorporating feminist perspectives in corporate law : analyzing the foundations and future directions of feminist and feminist-inspired corporate law scholarship / Anne M. Choike, Martha Albertson Fineman, and Cheryl Wade.