The Quality of Argumentations of First-Year Pre-Service Teachers / Leander Kempen and Rolf Biehler.

In this paper we report our findings from a study, in which 177 undergraduate pre-service teachers had to verify a statement of elementary number theory at the onset of a lecture serving as a bridging course. The answers were categorized to investigate the qualities of the given argumentations. We a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Authors: Kempen, Leander, Biehler, Rolf (Author)
Format: eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 2014.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b11020195
003 CoU
005 20200512140056.5
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
008 140101s2014 xx |||| o ||| s eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed599831 
035 |a (MvI) 6E000000578896 
040 |a ericd  |b eng  |c MvI  |d MvI 
099 |a ED599831 
100 1 |a Kempen, Leander. 
245 1 4 |a The Quality of Argumentations of First-Year Pre-Service Teachers /  |c Leander Kempen and Rolf Biehler. 
264 1 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 2014. 
300 |a 1 online resource (8 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Availability: North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. e-mail: pmena.steeringcommittee@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.pmena.org/.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Abstractor: As Provided.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Postsecondary Education. 
516 |a Text (Speeches/Meeting Papers) 
516 |a Text (Reports, Research) 
520 |a In this paper we report our findings from a study, in which 177 undergraduate pre-service teachers had to verify a statement of elementary number theory at the onset of a lecture serving as a bridging course. The answers were categorized to investigate the qualities of the given argumentations. We also separated the results of three different subsets: (1) the of students in their first semester, to get to know their level of arguing after having past their A-Levels, (2) the students, that take part in this course the first time and are in a higher semester and (3) the subset of repeaters to investigate their problems in detail. [For the complete proceedings, see ED597799.] 
524 |a North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Paper presented at the Joint Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (38th) and the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA) (36th, Vancouver, Canada, Jul 15-20, 2014).  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Persuasive Discourse.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Preservice Teachers.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Mathematics Instruction.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Validity.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Mathematical Logic.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Foreign Countries.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a College Freshmen.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Biehler, Rolf,  |e author. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599831.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b110201954  |b 05-21-20  |c 05-21-20 
998 |a web  |b 05-21-20  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 4  |i 0 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 9b5eff14-4463-55f5-923f-fa106dd14b25  |s ae935526-bdb0-5545-946b-453ce20ae460