Trump v. Mazars : implications for Congressional oversight / Todd Garvey.

Similar Items

• In the Supreme Court of the United States, Donald J. Trump, et al, petitioners, v. Mazars USA, LLP, et al., respondents Donald J. Trump, et al., petitioners, v. Deutsche Bank AG, et al., respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Second Circuits : brief of Niskanen Center, Republican Women for Progress, Bill Weld, et al. as amicus curiae in support of respondents /
  by: Wolff, Gregory Edwin, et al.
  Published: (2020)
• Congressional access to the President's federal tax returns /
  by: Carpenter, David Hatcher, et al.
  Published: (2018)
• Impeachment investigations : law and process /
  by: Garvey, Todd, et al.
  Published: (2019)
• Obstruction of justice does the Justice Department have to respond to a lawfully issued and valid congressional subpoena? : hearing before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session, June 13, 2011.
  Published: (2011)
• Obstruction of justice : does the Justice Department have to respond to a lawfully issued and valid congressional subpoena? : hearing before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, first session, June 13, 2011.
  Published: (2011)