Critical Thinking as a Predictor and Outcome Measure in a Large Undergraduate Educational Psychology Course [electronic resource] / Robert L. Williams.

This study first determined how well two types of critical thinking measures, generic and subject-specific, predicted performance on course tests. Secondly, the study examined the extent to which critical thinking changed from the beginning to the end of the course. Two generic and one subject-speci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Williams, Robert L., 1937-
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [Place of publication not identified] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 2003.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6132131
003 CoU
005 20080220161350.7
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 030101s2003 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed478075 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |a ERIC DOC #  |a ED478075 
100 1 |a Williams, Robert L.,  |d 1937-  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79029843. 
245 1 0 |a Critical Thinking as a Predictor and Outcome Measure in a Large Undergraduate Educational Psychology Course  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Robert L. Williams. 
260 |a [Place of publication not identified] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 2003. 
300 |a 19 pages. 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED478075. 
520 |a This study first determined how well two types of critical thinking measures, generic and subject-specific, predicted performance on course tests. Secondly, the study examined the extent to which critical thinking changed from the beginning to the end of the course. Two generic and one subject-specific measure of critical thinking were used in the study. A total of 428 college students participated in various phases of the study across 3 semesters. All the critical thinking measures better predicted performance on multiple-choice examinations requring critical thinking than on essay quizzes requiring only recall of course information. The Psychological Critical Thinking test (subject specific; T. Lawson, 1999) and the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal-Form S (generic; G. Watson and E. Glaser, 1980) were the best predictors of examination scores. Students also improved their scores on these two critical thinking measures significantly from the beginning to the end of the course. The pattern of change on critical thinking was somewhat different for high and low performers on examinations. (Contains 4 tables and 28 references.) (Author/SLD) 
650 1 7 |a Academic Achievement.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a College Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Critical Thinking.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Psychology.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Outcomes of Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Prediction.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Results.  |2 ericd. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED478075.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b6132131x  |b 07-05-22  |c 10-09-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-26-12  |c b  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
944 |a MARS - RDA ENRICHED 
956 |a ERIC 
948 |a bslw19/20 : feb : ess 
907 |a .b6132131x  |b 02-13-20  |c 10-09-10 
999 f f |i 6364f5d1-5f4e-5c89-934d-eba773ccbdca  |s 1a2fdb10-6c98-5504-b8d9-8d2b416f0c3c 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ERIC DOC # ED478075  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1