Organizational Groups in Conflict [microform] : A Case Study of Conflict Interaction from a Rules Perspective / Julie M. Billingsley and Marshall Scott Poole.

Arguing that by identifying rules, researchers can understand and explain behavioral and communicative processes in specific contexts, this paper outlines a formal method for conducting a rules analysis of a conflict case. The first section of the paper defines and summarizes the basic concepts rela...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Billingsley, Julie M.
Other Authors: Poole, Marshall Scott
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1986.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6205121
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 860501s1986 xx |||| bt ||| | eng d
005 20240722202112.4
035 |a (ERIC)ed278051 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED278051 
100 1 |a Billingsley, Julie M. 
245 1 0 |a Organizational Groups in Conflict  |h [microform] :  |b A Case Study of Conflict Interaction from a Rules Perspective /  |c Julie M. Billingsley and Marshall Scott Poole. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1986. 
300 |a 49 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (36th, Chicago, IL, May 22-26, 1986). Best copy available.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED278051. 
520 |a Arguing that by identifying rules, researchers can understand and explain behavioral and communicative processes in specific contexts, this paper outlines a formal method for conducting a rules analysis of a conflict case. The first section of the paper defines and summarizes the basic concepts relating to conflict, organizational groups, and communication rules. The second section discusses the feasibility of a rules study and its impact, along with the case study as one approach to research, while the third section presents a generative system for applying rules. The fourth section of the paper outlines a procedure for such a system and discusses its advantages. The fifth section describes a specific case study that examined conflict interactions within two interconnected groups in the same organization. The final section considers the advantages of the method of analysis in terms of rules research, case studies in general, and conflict research in particular. An appendix contains a list of the conflict rules observed in the study. (FL) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 2049101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies  
650 0 7 |a Case Studies.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Communication Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Communication (Thought Transfer)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Conflict.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Conflict Resolution.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Interaction.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Interaction Process Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Organizational Climate.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Organizational Communication.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Research Methodology.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Poole, Marshall Scott. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62051210  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-10-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i bd4c755f-3c2a-5346-ac0b-47a02c721e55  |s bb25f630-574d-5f28-8d77-36001ab08ec9 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED278051  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1