Using Tests To Evaluate the Impact of Curricular Reform on Higher Order Thinking [electronic resource] / Alan Davis.

The dominant issues in considering the use of tests developed outside the classroom to measure the impact of curriculum reform on higher order thinking are reviewed by a panel interviewed for this discussion. Panel members are: (1) Stuart Kahl, (2) Robert Linn, (3) Senta A. Raizen, (4) Lauren Resnic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Davis, Alan
Corporate Author: University of Colorado Boulder
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1992.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6236326
003 CoU
005 20080220151956.5
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 920831s1992 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed373114 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED373114 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED373114 
100 1 |a Davis, Alan. 
245 1 0 |a Using Tests To Evaluate the Impact of Curricular Reform on Higher Order Thinking  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Alan Davis. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1992. 
300 |a 16 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED373114. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Contract Number: RR91182001.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper commissioned by the Curriculum Reform Project.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a The dominant issues in considering the use of tests developed outside the classroom to measure the impact of curriculum reform on higher order thinking are reviewed by a panel interviewed for this discussion. Panel members are: (1) Stuart Kahl, (2) Robert Linn, (3) Senta A. Raizen, (4) Lauren Resnick, and (5) Thomas A. Romberg. It is conceded that, in the past, most tests used for program evaluation and accountability have not been good measures of thinking. To measure thinking, it is necessary to think in terms of systems of assessment, in which good tests may include a mixture of performance tasks, open-ended items, and multiple-choice items. Testing must occur on more than one occasion, and matrix sampling of tasks and occasions may allow inclusion of extended performance tasks. Test items should include appropriate novelty in order to test thinking, although it may not be entirely appropriate to report higher order thinking as something apart from subject content knowledge. To compare the impact of two different curricula, tests should include instructional content common to both (the intersection), or the combined content of both (the union). (Contains 5 references.) (SLD) 
521 8 |a Policymakers.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Administrators.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Teachers.  |b ericd. 
521 8 |a Practitioners.  |b ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Accountability.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Curriculum Development.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Educational Assessment.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Educational Change.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Elementary Secondary Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Matrices.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Multiple Choice Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Performance Based Assessment.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Program Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Sampling.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Test Content.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Use.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Thinking Skills.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a University of Colorado Boulder. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED373114.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b62363268  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-10-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-24-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 80755a13-8df9-5311-9711-edabe0964c74  |s 30b2c75a-77e5-5ab1-9ea1-2310004a9243 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED373114  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1