Evaluating Cloze as a Measure of Cognitive Change Due to Reading [microform] / James W. Cunningham and Robert J. Tierney.

This study compares the validity of three cloze procedures (traditional, limited, and least-major-constituent limited) when reading comprehension is defined as cognitive change. Over 400 seventh and eighth graders from public schools in North Carolina and Arizona were randomly assigned to one of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Cunningham, James W.
Other Authors: Tierney, Robert J.
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1977.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6260670
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 771201s1977 xx |||| b ||| s eng d
005 20240722192945.2
035 |a (ERIC)ed149318 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED149318 
100 1 |a Cunningham, James W. 
245 1 0 |a Evaluating Cloze as a Measure of Cognitive Change Due to Reading  |h [microform] /  |c James W. Cunningham and Robert J. Tierney. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1977. 
300 |a 14 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference (27th, New Orleans, Louisiana, December 1-3, 1977).  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED149318. 
520 |a This study compares the validity of three cloze procedures (traditional, limited, and least-major-constituent limited) when reading comprehension is defined as cognitive change. Over 400 seventh and eighth graders from public schools in North Carolina and Arizona were randomly assigned to one of the three cloze formats for either fiction or nonfiction passages, and to either an experimental or a control group. The experimental groups took the cloze test and one week later read the complete passage and took the cloze test again. Control group subjects followed the same procedures, but read complete passages that were unrelated to the cloze test. Results of the comparative analysis indicate that all of the cloze procedures were reliable measures, but that not all the cloze formats were consistently valid measures of reading comprehension defined as cognitive change. Two of the cloze formats (traditional and limited) were sensitive to the differential effects of reading, but only for the fiction passages. The study concludes that alternatives to cloze procedures should be sought when investigating reading comprehension as a cognitive process. (RL) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 1 7 |a Cloze Procedure.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Cognitive Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Comparative Analysis.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Grade 7.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Grade 8.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Junior High Schools.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Learning Processes.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Comprehension.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Reading Research.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Retention (Psychology)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Test Reliability.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Test Validity.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Tierney, Robert J. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b62606700  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-12-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-12-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 0628974e-9d77-55d9-92f6-072e1d9cd819  |s ad4371c9-c5c0-5231-b761-0548f150bbd6 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED149318  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1