Faculty Development [microform] : The American Experience / Peter Seldin.

A growing movement to improve the quality of teaching has been called "faculty development." It is based on three assumptions: the primary professional activity of most faculty is teaching; instructional behaviors are learned skills, attitudes, and goals; and faculty can be taught how to i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Request ERIC Document
Main Author: Seldin, Peter
Corporate Author: University of London. Institute of Education
Format: Microfilm Book
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1976.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002u 4500
001 b6266895
003 CoU
007 he u||024||||
008 760601s1976 xx |||| b ||| s eng d
005 20240722193242.0
035 |a (ERIC)ed158648 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED158648 
100 1 |a Seldin, Peter. 
245 1 0 |a Faculty Development  |h [microform] :  |b The American Experience /  |c Peter Seldin. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1976. 
300 |a 12 p. 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent. 
337 |a microform  |2 rdamedia. 
338 |a microfiche  |2 rdacarrier. 
500 |a Availability: University of London Institute of Education, UTMU, 55 Gordon Square, London WC1H ONT, England.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Note: Based on a seminar given at Newcastle Upon Tyne Polytechnic, June 1976.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED158648. 
520 |a A growing movement to improve the quality of teaching has been called "faculty development." It is based on three assumptions: the primary professional activity of most faculty is teaching; instructional behaviors are learned skills, attitudes, and goals; and faculty can be taught how to improve their classroom performance. Interest in faculty development programs is primarily linked to a tight job market for professors. Faculty development centers are usually led by a chief instructional officer holding dean or vice-president rank. Four popular approaches to faculty development are: financial incentives; lecture and discussion groups focusing on higher education issues and faculty concerns in teaching; inservice courses and workshops dealing with the improvement of specific instructional skills; and feedback programs designed to identify teaching skills needing improvement. Programs that utilize these approaches at different universities are described. Reasons are cited for limited participation in and benefit from faculty development programs. Few centers have developed evaluation procedures, and consequently there is little evidence of their success or failure. (SW) 
533 |a Microfiche.  |b [Washington D.C.]:  |c ERIC Clearinghouse  |e microfiches : positive. 
583 1 |a committed to retain  |c 20240101  |d 20490101  |5 CoU  |f Alliance Shared Trust  |u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies 
650 0 7 |a College Faculty.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Faculty Development.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Faculty Evaluation.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Inservice Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Instructional Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Professional Continuing Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Centers.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teacher Improvement.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Teacher Workshops.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Teaching Skills.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a University of London.  |b Institute of Education. 
856 4 2 |z Request ERIC Document  |u https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://colorado.illiad.oclc.org/illiad/COD/illiad.dll?Action=10&Form=23 
907 |a .b6266895x  |b 01-18-22  |c 10-12-10 
998 |a pas  |b 10-12-10  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 50971b48-a36d-5ee8-a50f-57ee6d279a19  |s 598afc0e-6012-5fd5-a8a2-16189accb86c 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Boulder Campus  |c Offsite  |d PASCAL Offsite  |e ED158648  |h Other scheme  |i microfiche  |n 1