On the Equivalence of Constructed-Response and Multiple-Choice Tests [electronic resource] / Ross E. Traub and Charles W. Fisher.

Two sets of mathematical reasoning and two sets of verbal comprehension items were cast into each of three formats--constructed response, standard multiple-choice, and Coombs multiple-choice--in order to assess whether tests with indentical content but different formats measure the same attribute, e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Traub, Ross E.
Other Authors: Fisher, Charles W.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1977.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6364931
003 CoU
005 20081118081444.2
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 081118s1977 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
035 |a (ERIC)ed129916 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED129916 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED129916 
100 1 |a Traub, Ross E. 
245 1 0 |a On the Equivalence of Constructed-Response and Multiple-Choice Tests  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Ross E. Traub and Charles W. Fisher. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1977. 
300 |a 31 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED129916. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Ontario Inst. for Studies in Education, Toronto.  |5 ericd. 
520 |a Two sets of mathematical reasoning and two sets of verbal comprehension items were cast into each of three formats--constructed response, standard multiple-choice, and Coombs multiple-choice--in order to assess whether tests with indentical content but different formats measure the same attribute, except for possible differences in error variance and scaling factors. The resulting 12 tests were administered to 199 eighth-grade students. The hypothesis of equivalent measures was rejected for only two comparisons: the constructed response measure of verbal comprehension was different from both the standard and the Coombs multiple-choice measures of this ability. Maximum likelihood factors analysis confirmed the hypothesis that a five factor structure will give a satisfactory account of the common variance among the 12 tests. As expected, the two major factors were mathematical reasoning and verbal comprehension. Contrary to expectation, only one of the other three factors bore a (weak) resemblance to a format factor. Tests marking the ability to follow directions, recall and recognition memory, and risk taking were included, but these variables did not correlate as expected with the three minor factors. (Author/MV) 
650 0 7 |a Memory.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Multiple Choice Tests.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Recall (Psychology)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Responses.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Risk.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Test Items.  |2 ericd. 
700 1 |a Fisher, Charles W. 
856 4 0 |z Full Text (via ERIC)  |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED129916.pdf 
907 |a .b63649317  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-15-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 7111847f-cc8a-5db8-82d3-f732743d3a3b  |s f03df21d-edd8-5c9a-92d9-1ca244160849 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED129916  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1