Recall of Different Segments of an Interpreted Lecture by Deaf Students [electronic resource] / Michael Stinson and Others.

Two experiments involving 36 deaf college students investigated the amounts of information remembered by students from the different quarters of a lecture and the effect of printed vs. interpreted presentation of lecture material. In the first experiment, 20 deaf college students received an interpr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full Text (via ERIC)
Main Author: Stinson, Michael
Corporate Author: National Technical Institute for the Deaf
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: [S.l.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1981.
Subjects:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002u 4500
001 b6441775
003 CoU
006 m d f
007 cr un
008 810301s1981 xx |||| ot ||| | eng d
005 20240729232033.7
035 |a (ERIC)ed209908 
040 |a ericd  |c ericd  |d MvI 
088 |a NTID-PS-41 
099 |f ERIC DOC #  |a ED209908 
100 1 |a Stinson, Michael. 
245 1 0 |a Recall of Different Segments of an Interpreted Lecture by Deaf Students  |h [electronic resource] /  |c Michael Stinson and Others. 
260 |a [S.l.] :  |b Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,  |c 1981. 
300 |a 23 p. 
500 |a ERIC Document Number: ED209908. 
500 |a Sponsoring Agency: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, DC.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a ERIC Note: For related documents, see EC 140 611-630.  |5 ericd. 
500 |a Educational level discussed: Higher Education. 
520 |a Two experiments involving 36 deaf college students investigated the amounts of information remembered by students from the different quarters of a lecture and the effect of printed vs. interpreted presentation of lecture material. In the first experiment, 20 deaf college students received an interpreted, videotaped presentation of one lecture and a printed presentation of a second lecture. In Experiment 2, sixteen deaf students received one interpreted presentation and, then, a second interpreted presentation on a different topic. In both experiments, students wrote down the information they remembered immediately after each presentation. Recall protocols were scored for the distribution of ideas recalled from each quarter of the lecture. The principal findings were that students recalled: more information from the first two quarters than from the second two; more information from a printed than an interpreted presentaton; and more information from a second interpreted presentation than from a previous interpreted one. Implications are drawn for providing educational support to mainstreamed deaf students. (Author/SB) 
650 1 7 |a College Students.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Deafness.  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Higher Education.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Lecture Method.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Memory.  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Recall (Psychology)  |2 ericd. 
650 1 7 |a Time Factors (Learning)  |2 ericd. 
650 0 7 |a Written Language.  |2 ericd. 
710 2 |a National Technical Institute for the Deaf. 
856 4 0 |u http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED209908.pdf  |z Full Text (via ERIC) 
907 |a .b6441775x  |b 07-06-22  |c 10-18-10 
998 |a web  |b 10-23-12  |c f  |d m   |e -  |f eng  |g xx   |h 0  |i 1 
956 |a ERIC 
999 f f |i 08fec184-920e-5a10-982e-8eada0936eab  |s 95165e79-38c9-5c7e-bd5d-eee30beab553 
952 f f |p Can circulate  |a University of Colorado Boulder  |b Online  |c Online  |d Online  |e ED209908  |h Other scheme  |i web  |n 1