On global justice / Mathias Risse.
Debates about global justice have traditionally fallen into two camps. Statists believe that principles of justice can only be held among those who share a state. Those who fall outside this realm are merely owed charity. Cosmopolitans, on the other hand, believe that justice applies equally among a...
Saved in:
Online Access: |
Full Text (via ProQuest) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Princeton, N.J. :
Princeton University Press,
2012.
|
Subjects: |
Table of Contents:
- The grounds of justice
- "Un pouvoir ordinaire": shared membership in a state as a ground of
- Justice
- Internationalism versus statism and globalism: contemporary debates
- What follows from our common humanity? : the institutional stance, human rights, and nonrelationism
- Hugo Grotius revisited : collective ownership of the Earth and global public reason
- "Our sole habitation" : a contemporary approach to collective ownership of the earth
- Toward a contingent derivation of human rights
- Proportionate use : immigration and original ownership of the Earth
- "But the earth abideth for ever" : obligations to future generations
- Climate change and ownership of the atmosphere
- Human rights as membership rights in the global order
- Arguing for human rights : essential pharmaceuticals
- Arguing for human rights : labor rights as human rights
- Justice and trade
- The way we live now
- "Imagine there's no countries" : a reply to John Lennon
- Justice and accountability : the state
- Justice and accountability : the World Trade Organization.